NCAA Eligible?

THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR IN RECRUITING TO BROWN HOCKEY!

(CHECKLIST FOR NCAA ELIGIBILITY)

(EXAMPLES OF VIOLATIONS)

 

🧠 NCAA ELIGIBILITY FACTOR (NEF)

βœ… COMPLETE FACTOR LIST

Think of NEF as 5 required domains (not 4).
Each one answers a different risk question.


🧩 1. πŸ“œ NCAA AMATEURISM STATUS (NON-NEGOTIABLE)

πŸ”‘ Must Answer:

Is the player still an amateur under NCAA rules?

Factors to Check:

  • ❓ Signed any professional contract
  • ❓ Received salary / stipend beyond expenses
  • ❓ Played on a professional team roster
  • ❓ Accepted prize money beyond actual expenses
  • ❓ Used an agent (improperly)
  • ❓ Endorsed products / NIL violations (for internationals)

Output:

  • βœ… Eligible
  • ⚠️ At Risk
  • ❌ Ineligible

πŸ‘‰ If ❌ β†’ player is NOT NEF eligible


🧩 2. πŸŽ“ ACADEMIC ELIGIBILITY (IVY + NCAA)

πŸ”‘ Must Answer:

Can this player get into Brown AND stay eligible?

Factors:

  • GPA / equivalent
  • Academic rigor:
    • IB
    • AP
    • A-levels
  • Standardized tests (if applicable)
  • English proficiency (TOEFL/IELTS for internationals)

NEF Threshold:

  • Minimum viable: Score β‰₯ 3
  • Target (Brown): β‰₯ 4

🧩 3. ⏳ AGE & NCAA CLOCK STATUS

πŸ”‘ Must Answer:

Has the player’s eligibility clock started or been compromised?

Factors:

  • Age (typically 18–21 window)
  • Years since high school graduation
  • Time spent in junior hockey AFTER graduation
  • Delayed enrollment

Red Flags:

  • Too many post-grad years
  • Playing too long after graduation before enrolling

πŸ‘‰ Important for:

  • Canadian juniors
  • European players delaying NCAA entry

🧩 4. πŸ’ COMPETITION & LEAGUE STATUS

πŸ”‘ Must Answer:

Was the league NCAA-compliant for amateur participation?

Factors:

  • League type:
    • βœ… USHL / NAHL / BCHL β†’ safe
    • ⚠️ European leagues β†’ variable
  • Team classification:
    • Amateur vs professional
  • Teammates paid? (can affect status)
  • Player compensation within league

Key Insight:

πŸ‘‰ European leagues are the biggest hidden risk


🧩 5. πŸ“ˆ DEVELOPMENT + PATHWAY VIABILITY

(This is YOUR value-addβ€”not NCAA compliance, but critical)

πŸ”‘ Must Answer:

Is this player realistically on a path to NCAA hockey?

Factors:

  • Current league level
  • Trajectory (improving vs plateau)
  • Physical development
  • Ability to transition to:
    • USHL
    • NAHL
    • Prep

πŸ“Š FINAL NEF DETERMINATION

βœ… NEF ELIGIBLE PLAYER =

Must meet ALL:

βœ”οΈ 1. Amateur Status = βœ…

βœ”οΈ 2. Academic Score β‰₯ 3 (β‰₯4 for Brown)

βœ”οΈ 3. Age/Clock = viable

βœ”οΈ 4. League = compliant

βœ”οΈ 5. Pathway = realistic